Case Study > Streamlining Deployment Automation for a SaaS Company
Technology & Software
Streamlining Deployment Automation for a SaaS Company
															Focus Areas
SaaS Platform Reliability
Deployment Automation
Operational Efficiency
															Business Problem
A mid-sized SaaS company offering project management and productivity tools was experiencing delays and inconsistencies in deploying new features and updates. Manual processes for code deployment, configuration, and environment setup led to errors, slow releases, and a lack of visibility across teams. Leadership sought to modernize their deployment strategy to accelerate delivery while reducing downtime and human error.
Key challenges:
Manual Deployments: Scripts were run manually with inconsistent steps, increasing risk of failure.
Lack of Standardization: Different teams used different tools and workflows, complicating troubleshooting.
Slow Release Cycles: Deployments occurred weekly or bi-weekly, limiting responsiveness to user feedback.
Limited Rollback Mechanisms: Failures during deployment required time-consuming manual intervention.
Poor Visibility: Teams lacked real-time insight into pipeline status, test results, and environment health.
The Approach
Curate worked closely with the company to design and implement a robust deployment automation strategy. The goal was to build standardized, secure, and scalable CI/CD pipelines that could support multiple environments and application teams with minimal manual effort.
Key components of the solution:
Discovery and Requirements Gathering:
Current State Analysis: Mapped out existing deployment processes and tools (e.g., shell scripts, Jenkins).
Workflow Gap Analysis: Identified inefficiencies in build, test, and deployment stages.
Stakeholder Workshops: Engaged product, QA, and engineering teams to define success metrics and requirements.
Environment Audit: Reviewed configurations, access controls, and dependencies for dev, staging, and production.
Solution Design and Implementation:
CI/CD Pipeline Standardization:
Built reusable pipeline templates using GitHub Actions and GitLab CI.
Integrated unit testing, static code analysis, and security scans.
Deployment Automation:
Used Terraform and Helm for declarative provisioning and Kubernetes-based deployments.
Implemented blue-green and canary deployment strategies.
Infrastructure as Code:
Migrated environment setup to Terraform modules for consistency and version control.
Secrets and Configuration Management:
Integrated with Vault and environment-specific config maps to manage secrets securely.
Observability and Alerting:
Deployed Prometheus and Grafana for pipeline metrics and error monitoring.
Added Slack and PagerDuty integrations for real-time alerts.
Process Optimization and Change Management:
Release Governance: Introduced pull request checks, approval gates, and automated rollback triggers.
Knowledge Sharing: Created documentation, playbooks, and recorded enablement sessions.
Cross-Team Collaboration: Established regular syncs between QA, Dev, and Ops teams for continuous improvement.
Business Outcomes
Accelerated Time to Market
						
Releases moved from weekly to daily cycles, enabling faster delivery of features and patches.					
Improved Deployment Success Rate
						
Error rates dropped significantly due to automated validation and testing.					
Higher Developer Productivity
						
Teams focused more on coding and innovation rather than managing release logistics.					
Increased Visibility and Control
						
Centralized dashboards provided real-time insights into deployments and failures.					
Sample KPIs
Here’s a quick summary of the kinds of KPI’s and goals teams were working towards**:
| Metric | Before | After | Improvement | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Release frequency | 1/week | Daily | 5x increase | 
| Deployment failure rate | 18% | 2% | 89% reduction | 
| Mean time to deployment (MTTD) | 4 hours | 20 minutes | 92% faster | 
| Rollback time | 60 minutes | 5 minutes | 92% efficient | 
| Developer time spent on releases | 20% | 5 minutes | 75% improvement | 
Customer Value
Operational Consistency
						
Reduced deployment variance and improved reliability.
					
Scalability
						
The automated framework now supports parallel deployments across products and environments.					
Sample Skills of Resources
DevOps Engineers: Built and maintained automated pipelines, integrated security checks.
Platform Engineers: Designed Terraform and Helm-based deployment blueprints.
QA Automation Specialists: Developed automated tests and integrated them into CI workflows.
Site Reliability Engineers (SREs): Improved monitoring and managed alerting strategies.
Project Managers: Oversaw rollout, stakeholder communications, and feedback loops.
Tools & Technologies
CI/CD Platforms: GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins
IaC & Deployment: Terraform, Helm, ArgoCD
Monitoring & Alerting: Prometheus, Grafana, PagerDuty, Slack
Security: Trivy, Vault, Checkov
Collaboration: Jira, Confluence, Notion
															Conclusion
With Curate’s support, the SaaS company transformed its deployment operations from manual and inconsistent to automated and scalable. The new CI/CD pipelines not only enhanced release velocity and stability but also laid a foundation for future innovations, including AI-driven testing and predictive deployment analytics.
All Case Studies
View recent studies below or our entire library of work

Building a governed data foundation
Curate Partners helped a leading bank modernize its data product and governance framework to enable real-time insights and enterprise reporting.

Building a single source of truth for customer data
A leading healthcare organization was operating with fragmented customer data across marketing, service, and operational systems.

Modernizing Medicare enrollment journeys
Healthcare case study Modernizing Medicare enrollment journeys A regional healthcare insurer partnered with Curate Partners to streamline enrollment workflows and deliver a seamless, member-first experience.

Marketing tech optimization for scalable growth
A Global Tech SaaS company was grappling with unchecked Technology sprawl—tools were being acquired through decentralized budgets, leading to redundant platforms, siloed data, rising costs, and poor integration across the enterprise.